An AI Scribe That Writes the Doctor's Notes — So She Can Look at the Patient

From conversation to chart in five steps

01 Recording — the doctor starts recording and talks with the patient as usual. The recording saves continuously: a closed browser or dead laptop loses nothing. Recordings made elsewhere can be uploaded as files.

02 Transcript — the conversation is transcribed in Czech; the transcript stays available in the app for reading and correcting.

03 Previous visit — the app finds the last real examination in the patient's chart and builds on it, medication list included. Standalone prescription and billing records are skipped — there is no examination note in them.

04 Draft record — the note is drafted in the clinic's template: same section order, same abbreviations the doctor is used to. The draft includes a list of values that were not said out loud and still need filling in.

05 Approve & write — the doctor reviews, edits, and with one button the record is written straight into the patient's chart in the practice software. No copy-pasting between two windows.

Built to never guess

It invents nothing. A value that wasn't said stays empty and appears on the fill-in list. For a doctor, that's the only acceptable behaviour.

Medication names get mangled in transcripts. The app writes the closest phonetic match and flags it with a question mark for the doctor to verify. It never substitutes a different drug.

History carries over; findings are written fresh. The anamnesis builds on the last report and changes only with today. The objective finding always starts from a normal finding and overwrites what the doctor dictated.

What the patient says and what the doctor sees are two different things. If the patient reports swelling and the examination shows none, the claim belongs in the history and the finding stays negative. The app flags the contradiction itself.

The template belongs to the practice. Section wording, normal findings and style rules are editable directly in the app — no programmer needed.

Tested against the doctor's own hand-written records

We recorded three real visits in the practice and compared the output with the records the doctor wrote by hand the same day. The generated notes matched her manual version — style and abbreviations included.

For one patient, the generated record was more accurate than the hand-written one: the manual note still carried a blood pressure value copied from December 2024, while the app used the value measured at that day's examination.

For another patient, the app flagged a medication discrepancy without being asked. The test also caught one bug on our side — which we fixed.

IN PRODUCTION — at the practice since July 2026.

INTEGRATION — reads the previous visit and writes new records directly into the patient chart in the practice software.

TEMPLATE — fourteen sections, maintained by the clinic itself.

SCOPE — documentation; Holter billing runs as a separate part of the app.

Ahead of a full rollout, data-processing agreements will be put in place, and multi-doctor support — attributing each record to its author — is the next step.